A Few Quick Thoughts On Failure

Making yourself look bad is bad enough. Making your employer look bad is much worse.

Chaotic GeometryWant to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

 

Failure is part of this business. I’ve said many times that mixing a live show is “screwing up and fixing it a million times, very quickly.”

Some failures are worse than others, though. I’d even categorize failures into acceptable and unacceptable groups. Acceptable failures have the geometry of what I described above: Something that you can fix very quickly, and is really not noticeable to most observers. A mix not being absolutely perfect at any given point is an easy example of that.

Unacceptable failures, on the other hand, may not be correctable swiftly, and/ or are very noticeable, and at the extreme end of the spectrum can put people in physical danger. (A serious-injury-producing safety compromise automatically earns an “unacceptable” rating, no matter what.) If safety issues are excluded, though, what’s the worst kind of unacceptable failure?

The one where your employer looks bad – not just you. When the folks writing the checks are embarrassed because of something you did or failed to do, when other people regard them poorly because of their association with your lack of execution.

Ick. That’s an awful feeling. It’s like burning to a crisp from the inside, except that actually turning into charcoal would put you out of your misery.

How do you avoid that eventuality? It’s just like everything else: Do your homework. Resist the temptation to cut corners. Insist on a schedule that’s actually achievable in real life. Have a backup plan. (Especially if anything you’re doing involves wireless anything. Mics. In-ears. Remote console control. ANYTHING.) Assiduously refrain from making a promise that you don’t have a clear pathway for executing on. (“Tell ‘em whatever to get the job, and we’ll just figure it out later” is not an appropriate strategy for anything at any time.)

And what happens when you inevitably encounter a situation where you can’t avoid that feeling? If you’re in this long enough, you’re going to live through a trainwreck of some severity.

I can only recommend that you try to own your mistakes. Don’t attempt to BS your way out of trouble. Apologize, explain what went wrong, and how you didn’t account for it. In the most extreme cases, a reputation for honesty and humility may be all you have left to salvage. If that’s what you’re left with, then hold onto it. You’ll need it later.

The previous is not easy. I’ve been doing this for decades, and I still can’t always fight against the urge to justify myself. We have a powerful need for that as people, and beyond that baseline I think audio humans often develop a special need to be validated. We all have this latent desire to be seen as “the best,” and pretty much everything (including ourselves) threatens that desire.

But, as I said: Try. Practice owning your small mistakes so that a big one isn’t a completely novel experience. It’s just like anything. Running simulations makes you less likely to panic during the real thing.

X32 Vs M32

They appear to measure differently, but it might not be how you expected it to be.

Measurement TracesWant to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

 

If you’re like me, first – I’m sorry.

But beyond me being sorry, you’re probably also wondering just how different an M32 is from an X32. After all, software wise, they appear to be exactly the same console. They will happily consume each other’s scene files. Their firmware updates are exactly the same size on a disk. If the control surfaces didn’t have large cosmetic differences, and the M32 wasn’t twice as expensive, you might not easily contrast the two units.

So, is there a difference in audio performance between an X32 and an M32? That’s a question that’s been burning in my mind for years, and I just recently had the opportunity to borrow an M32 from a friend for some measuring. (“Thank you” to Bobby Solis of No BS Sound.)

Let’s start off with the assumptions I’m making in undertaking this comparison. First, I’m assuming that the M32 Bobby lent me and the X32 I picked from my inventory are representative of M32 and X32 consoles in general, neither significantly over or under-performing compared to the average unit of either type. I’m also assuming that my measurement system didn’t change significantly between measurements. Finally, I’m assuming that I made good judgements on the basics of the measurement process.

Speaking of which, the measurement process went like this: For both consoles, I ran them at 48 kHz and set up a signal path that went from a preamp, to a channel, and then out the main bus. For one measurement, I set the preamp to unity gain and adjusted the channel level to drive my measurement system as close to -20 dBFS as I could. For another measurement, I kept everything the same except for engaging the channel EQ with a preset curve. Then, I disengaged the EQ and dropped the channel level down, and then tried to get as close to 10% harmonic distortion as I could by clipping the mic pre. I then re-adjusted the channel level to get back to -20 dBFS on my measurement system. With that done, I did two more measurements (one with an RTA to easily see the pattern of harmonics, and one regular sweep.)

Results And Discussion

First, let’s take a look at the “Preamp Unity” comparison between the two consoles. The red trace is the M32, and the purple trace is the X32.

Combined Magnitude And Phase

There are measurable differences, but I did have to zoom the graph quite a bit to make them easy to differentiate. The Midas is flatter overall, with a difference of about 0.8 dB between the minimum and maximum measurement points. The Behringer’s “flatness” is 1.1 dB by comparison. The X32’s top end rolls off earlier, but also more gradually than the M32. Again, bear in mind that the graph is spreading a 1 dB difference into a very large space. The phase traces are so close as to be nearly indistinguishable, although the M32 is just a tiny bit flatter at the bottom and top.

Now, let’s examine the the difference between two equivalent channel equalizations. The M32 is the teal trace, and the X32 is orange.

Combined Magnitude And Phase Of EQ

With EQ applied, the consoles become harder to differentiate. The Midas retains a very small advantage in terms of top-end flatness, though the advantage is only about 0.3 dB. A tiny difference in phase linearity still favors the M32 as well.

So, what about distortion? Here are the harmonic patterns of M32 and X32 preamps being driven into clipping. The M32 is green and the X32 is red.

Combined Distortion Harmonics

The Behringer seems to be a little more pronounced on the higher harmonics than the Midas. The X32 also favors its odd harmonics a bit more than its more expensive counterpart.

The M32’s distortion stats:
THD 10.9 %
THD+N (20Hz..20kHz) 11.7 %
2nd harmonic 0.83%
3rd harmonic 10.5%
4th harmonic 0.29%
5th harmonic 2.69%
6th harmonic 0.19%
7th harmonic 0.93%
8th harmonic 0.13%
9th harmonic 0.65%

The X32’s distortion stats:
THD 11.3 %
THD+N (20Hz..20kHz) 11.8 %
2nd harmonic 0.83%
3rd harmonic 10.9%
4th harmonic 0.29%
5th harmonic 2.81%
6th harmonic 0.20%
7th harmonic 1.02%
8th harmonic 0.13%
9th harmonic 0.79%

Having seen this behavior, I was inspired to go back and look at the distortion differences between the consoles when they were running “clean.” In these traces, the Behringer is the top trace and the Midas is the bottom.

Combined THD

Running a “clean” preamp, the X32 is obviously more noisy – in a measurement, and below 200 Hz – than the M32.

In my opinion, we can very safely conclude that the M32 has better audio performance than the X32 “on paper.” Any other conclusion is one that I have far less confidence in. Is the top-end extension of the M32 something that most of us are likely to hear? Some folks would insist the answer is a resounding “yes,” whereas I remain skeptical. (I’ve never listened to a show mixed on an X32 and ended up wondering where the high-end was.) Similarly, I now know that an X32 might not pass as clean a signal as an M32, especially in the low end. But I’ve never “heard” that before and thought it was a problem; I had to see a graph to have any idea that the difference was even there.

Herein lies the difficulty: There are folks out there who are absolutely convinced that an M32 sounds noticeably and obviously better than an X32. There are folks out there (including me) who are similarly persuaded that any differences present are inaudible when encountered in the field.

What I can come to say at the end of all this is relatively simple. Spending more money to get a Midas certainly gets you a piece of equipment that measures a bit better and presents different characteristics when you drive the frontend hard. Are those differences alone enough to justify paying twice as much? That’s a question you have to answer for yourself. For my part, I will continue to use my Behringer units without a worry (especially because driving the preamps hard is something I avoid whenever possible). That might not be your story.

Patch Pain Points

The digital world is very flexible, but sometimes a bit confusing.

Tangled FractalWant to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

 

I’ve spent a good deal of time in the last few years running into various patching/ routing problems. A few of them were my own, but many have been other folks who got tripped up. All of them that I can easily remember had to do with digital consoles.

I think I have an idea why.

The analog world tends to be very – shall we say – 1:1. If you plug a microphone into mic-pre 1, then it’s very likely that mic-pre 1 easily and automatically shows up in channel 1. Further, you tend to have a general alignment between the number of inputs available and the channels for those inputs to flow through. Yes, it’s true that you might have a fancier console with separate mic and line inputs on each channel. You might even have to switch between them. Even so, the tendency is for [input point n] to belong to [channel n], with a change to that scheme requiring a very obvious and very physical patch.

Digital consoles are also ubiquitously 1:1 when just “out of the box,” of course, but there are more and more consoles at accessible price points that don’t have to be that way at all. They might have a great many input options available, and those inputs may outstrip the channel count by far. For instance, the Behringer X32s in my inventory have something like 168 inputs available, but only 40 channels (32 first-class and 8 “auxiliary”) to run them through. That is, they have 32 analog inputs on the back, plus 48 inputs from AES A, 48 more inputs from AES B, 32 inputs from the USB card, and 8 “aux” inputs on top of that. With such an array of possible input points, and the very non-physical nature of the digital input matrix that chooses what input points are actually connected, the logical divorce from the channels available is – potentially – very great. Channel 1 might be handling audio from AES B 9. Channel 16 might be onboard mic pre 1. Unless you look at the totality of the input matrix and the channel’s source assignment, you can’t be sure.

The same is true of outputs. Folks invested in analog mixers are used to the idea that mix bus 1 very likely shows up on an output tied forever to that bus. Furthermore, terminology is tied strongly to fixed routing choices. E.g., a “bus” is fed from the channel, post fader, at unity gain, whereas an “aux” might be fed from either a pre or post-fader point, at a user-selectable gain.

Now, we go to digital world, and it’s increasingly more likely that “bus” is used as a generic term for any signal line that can be fed from multiple channels. That bus might be fed as pre-fader, post-channel-eq on channel 1, post-fade with user-selectable gain on channel 15, and sub-group style with post-fade unity gain on channel 31. So…what is that bus, then? A subgroup? Yes. A post-fade “aux” mix? Yes. A pre-fade “aux” mix? Also yes.

And now, which output stream does that bus feed? It’s entirely possible that there are far more buses than physical outputs. Again, an X32 has 16 configurable buses, 6 matrices, two main mix buses, a mono mix bus,  32 channel direct outs, 8 aux channel direct outs, 8 FX rack direct outs, the monitor mix bus, and the talkback. That’s 76 output sources, but an X32 only has 16 output streams…which can connect to 16 analog output “ports” if you have a full-size console or stagebox. Otherwise, you might only have 8 ports available. You can patch the streams to different physical outputs as well.

I don’t want to overplay my hand here. Most of us try to set things up so that inputs and outputs aren’t patched around in utterly mind-boggling configurations. Even with that being so, I think you can see that the flexibility and complexity of digital routing can catch a person off guard. I confuse myself sometimes, and I’m almost a native resident of digital consoles. (I’ve been around them, and have preferred them, for a very long time.)

So, what’s my point?

My point is that a full-featured digital mixer requires thought and understanding to operate. You have to have a clear idea of what you want from your signal flow, and avoid “flailing about” at all costs. Randomly banging away at the various patching matrices available to you is likely to make things worse. You have to go in with a plan, and make any changes deliberately. If you don’t, you’re likely to dig yourself a pretty deep hole.

The Studio Facility That Wasn’t

It was a nice dream. It lasted a few months, anyway.

Studio LayoutWant to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

There’s a bit of a story here.

Almost twenty years ago, I was a recent graduate of The Conservatory Of Recording Arts And Sciences. I loved the place, had done very well academically, and was ready to “go out there.” Take over the world. It was at that place I had met a man that I’ll call “The Guitar Player,” or TGP for short. We spoke at length and became friendly.

TGP was a middle-aged musician who had reached a certain amount of success as a younger player. Now, he said, he was ready to get back in the game. He wanted to start a record company with its own recording facilities – and would I like to run the technical side of things?

I couldn’t have possibly said no to that.

Now, you have to remember that this was right at the turn of the century. The Internet hadn’t upended everything yet, and the recording arm of the music industry still supported “the big studio” in a way that is much more in the realm of memory now. In my mind, the business was at a kind of peak that is unlikely to be repeated. It seemed entirely plausible that a kid just barely into his 20s could get snapped up and put in such a position as was being offered. I was hooked.

What followed was a tremendous amount of initial excitement and the slow unraveling of a dream. I saw a lot of warning signs, but talked myself and everyone around me out of interpreting them correctly. Meetings that would truly move the project forward always fell through. Deals would always be finished “in a couple of weeks.” When I got to the point of asking tough questions, TGP would get agitated and I would back off.

In the end, I was always complimented. Honored, even. Introduced as the guy who would be in charge of the coolest studio in Phoenix. There was a dinner at TGP’s apartment where I was treated like family. I think my presence was necessary for TGP to keep selling his story. In a way, my guess is that he was desperate to put something together that would work, and justify all the hype he was building. It was a Ponzi scheme, but the currency was life itself. The magic would happen, it just needed more time. More time. A little more time.

I couldn’t bail out. No sir. The music industry was full of stories where somebody took off, and a month later all the folks who stayed had hit it big. There was always exactly enough hope for me to hold on, until someone from the school finally showed me how all the pieces couldn’t possibly hold together. I can’t exactly remember how I felt, although I think a mixture of crushing disappointment and vague relief were the cocktail on offer. I said that I had to attend to some family business in California, and I was sorry I couldn’t stay on. I packed up my one-room apartment and moved to my Grandma’s place near the coast.

TGP said that family was the most important thing, and that he’d get me paid for my work. The money didn’t come, but I didn’t expect it to.

In the course of the saga, I was asked to create designs for the grand facility that would get built “once the lawyers had signed all the papers.” I took a couple of days and poured out my vision of what could be. Recently, in the process of cleaning out a bunch of old documents, I ran across my drawings again. I still have a sense of pride in them. You’ll see a bunch of monitor speakers laid out for 5.1 surround mixing. (The music industry was still pushing for higher fidelity and more playback channels, not realizing that convenient portability would win every battle for the hearts and minds of listeners in just a few years.)

Control Room A

Control Room A

Control Room B

Control Room B

Preproduction/ Songwriting

Preproduction Room

Studio Proper

Studio Proper


When I post this article to Patreon, I’ll get a bit of money from my supporters. That means I’ll finally get paid for these designs after almost 20 years.

I also recently learned that TGP passed away. I think he managed to get a band together and play shows after the parting of our ways. I don’t know if he ever recaptured that sense of glory and triumph he had when he was young. But maybe he did.

In whatever case, I hope he sailed into the West and that he’s drenched in joy, playing a soaring solos at the great gig in the sky. I can’t be angry with him. The circle is closed.

The Gigs To Take

Search for the good ones, which are not always the best paying.

Nope Yeah Typographical ImageWant to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

At this point in my career, I am far more willing to turn down work than I used to be. A foundational part of that is due to how fortunate and privileged I am: As a dual-career (software-engineering is my other job), I simply am not 100% reliant on show production to pay the bills. Not everyone is as lucky as I am, and I need to acknowledge that immediately.

The next chunk of the foundation is that I believe very strongly in high-quality clients being a HUGE factor in becoming (and staying) a high-quality craftsperson. The evaluation of the quality of a client is not necessarily a set of hard-and-fast rules, but there are several metrics that come together in making a decision that is – at the very least – well informed.

  • Is the effective day-rate worth the trouble?

    I’m in the camp that says, “Any show basically requires a whole day.” If the pay isn’t enough to compensate for a day’s worth of effort, then either other metrics fill the gap or the gig is declined.
  • Regardless of any promised amount, was it easy or hard to get paid?

    This one’s a bit tough, due to it often being a bit of “ex post facto” experience, but it’s a great determinant for sticking with something or moving on. You can sometimes be surprised here. I once landed a house gig in a well-appointed venue sitting in the very fancy town around these parts. (The place where they have that big film festival every year.) Things seemed okay for a bit, and then my payroll check bounced. I was a bit shocked…and I didn’t hang around long. In contrast, my not-fancy-but-filled-with-love neighborhood-venue job that I had before? They never, ever failed to pay me on time and in full, even when they were just barely hanging on by their fingernails. I did five years there, and I miss that place.
  • Is this going to be a repeat client that I can build a real relationship with?

    You can’t always know if a one-off will turn into something else, but you can take a guess. Established acts and arts organizations are better bets than random callers. The best “initial contacts” are the ones that say, “we want to hire you for a series of shows.” Gigs where they just need you to fill in can sometimes turn out well, but tend to be pretty weak in regard to this measure.
  • If the gig involves an installed system, is the install decent?

    An in-house system need not be the latest and greatest, but it should be something that you’re interested in working with and fits your workflow. If the install doesn’t contribute to your success, or worse, is built in a way that impedes your ability to execute, that’s a big reason to walk away from a potential job.
  • Are the people going to be great to work with?

    Great people make jobs of lesser swankiness anywhere from tolerable to desirable. One bad attitude makes the “room you’ve heard of with a band you’ve heard of” into a situation that I ignore calls for. The quality of the people involved with a gig is so critical that, in the cases of folks I’d rather not work with, they could offer me three times my day rate and I’d still have to think long and hard about taking the job.
  • Am I able to bring a sense of quality to the table?

    The very best prospects are the ones where I can make improvements and take the show to a level where it hasn’t been before. If they just want someone to push the same buttons in the same ways as the last person, that’s far less worthwhile.
  • Do they want to work with me, or just “generic A/V operator 975623?”

    This is very similar to the previous point. If you’re being brought into an opportunity where your specific talents are needed and desired, that’s an excellent possibility. If a client merely desires that you step in as an equivalent replacement, that’s not so enticing.
  • Are the events going to be a blast?

    If you’re going to work with new technologies, do interesting work, learn a lot, and create art you can be proud of, that can be worth significant tradeoffs on the monetary side. On the other hand, a gig with decent pay that’s a grind will soon not seem to be a decent situation at all. If the day is going to be un-fun and not pay very well, there’s no reason to bother.

Please understand that none of this is meant to be “snooty.” I think it’s good to work some less-than-awesome gigs in order to get a sense of appreciation for the great shows. At the same time, the faster you learn that high-quality work is done for high-quality clients, the better.

Details Of A Streaming Setup

A few mics, a few speakers, a few cameras, a mixer, and a laptop.

Backyard Sound SystemWant to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

A few days ago, I was contacted by Forest Aeon on Patreon. Forest asked me to go into detail about the streaming setup I’ve been using for Carolyn’s Garden concerts during these days of “pandemia.” I was tickled to be asked and happy to oblige. So, first things first. Here’s a diagram:

Streaming Setup Diagram

But what does it all mean?

To start with, streaming requires audio and video inputs. Those inputs are fed to hardware or software that can combine them into a multiplexed audio/ video stream, and then that stream is sent to an endpoint – like Facebook, YouTube, or (in my case) Restream.io

For my purposes, the audio required a good bit of heavy lifting. High production-values were a must, and those standards – while high everywhere – had to meet different needs at multiple destinations. The musicians needed multiple mixes for stage monitors, the small audience present at Carolyn’s needed something they could listen to, the streaming laptop also needed an appropriately processed version of the main mix, and I needed to monitor that feed to the laptop.

With all those needs, a well-appointed mixing console was a must. An X32 was the natural choice, because it has the routing and processing necessary to make it all happen. There were mixes for the individual musicians, a mix for the live audience, and crucially, a mix for the stream that “followed” the main mix but had some independence.

What I mean by that last phrase is driven by signal flow. The stream mix is post-fader, just like the main mix, so if I put more of a channel into the main mix, that channel will also be driven harder in the stream. This makes sense to have in place, because a solo that needs a little push for the live audience should also get a push for the remote audience. At the same time, I allowed a good bit of margin in where those post-fader sends could be placed. The reason for that was to deal with the difference between a stream mix that is far more immune to acoustic contributions in the room than a live mix. In the live mix, a particular instrument might be “hot” in the monitors, and only need a bit of reinforcement in the room. However, that monitor bleed is not nearly as prevalent for the mix to the stream, so that particular channel might need to be “scaled up” to create an appropriate blend for the remote listeners.

Another reason for a separate stream mix was to be able to have radically different processing for the mix as a whole. Just as a starter, the stream mix was often delayed by 100ms or more to better match the timing of the video. If the stream mix was just a split of the main output, that would have meant a very troublesome delay for the audience in the garden. Further, the stream mix was heavily compressed in order for its volume to be consistently high, as that’s what is generally expected by people listening to “playback.” Such compression would have been quite troublesome (and inappropriate, and unnecessary) for the live audience.

The mix for the stream was directed to the console’s option card, which is a USB audio interface. That USB audio was then handed off to the streaming laptop, which had an OBS (Open Broadcast Studio) input set to use the ASIO plugin available for OBS. All other available audio from the laptop was excluded from the broadcast.

Video managed to be both quite easy and a little tricky, just in divergent ways. On the easy side, getting three – very basic – USB cameras from Amazon into a USB hub and recognized by OBS was pretty much a snap. However, the combined video data from all three cameras ended up saturating the USB bus, meaning that I ended up setting the cameras to shut themselves off when not in use. Transitions from camera to camera were less smooth, then, as the camera being transitioned from would abruptly shut off, but I could keep all three cameras available at a moment’s notice.

With OBS I could combine those camera feeds with the mixer audio, plus some text and graphics, and then encode the result into an RTMP stream to Restream.io (As an aside, a very handy feature of OBS is the Scene Collection, which allowed me to have a set of scenes for each act. In my case, this made having a Venmo address for each act much easier, because switching to the appropriate collection brought up the correct text object.)

A very big thing for me was the manner in which the laptop was connected to the public Internet. I was insistent on using a physical patch cable, because I simply don’t trust Wi-fi to be reliable enough for high-value streaming. That’s not to say I would turn down wireless networking in a pinch, but I would never have it as my first option. Luckily, Cat6 patch cable is pretty darn cheap, being available for about $0.25 per foot. A 100′ cable, then, is all of $25. That’s awfully affordable for peace of mind, and drives home the point that it takes very expensive wireless to be as good as a basic piece of wire.

So, there you have it: My streaming setup for summer concerts.

DMX For All Things

DMX cable works for everything, so why not just use that?

stylized-xlr-endWant to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

 

I am currently in the process of converting all of my XLR cable inventory over to 110 Ohm DMX cable. It’s going to take a long time, because I still have a significant amount of “vanilla mic-cable” stock. That stock is comprised of the cables that have lived this long, and are likely (in my mind) to keep on living for a good while. The terrible cables and connectors die early. The rest do tend to linger.

Why do this?

The summary above almost says it all. DMX cable, terminated with 3-pin XLR ends, works in all cases. You can connect mics with it. You can run outputs to amps and loudspeakers with it. You can use it for whatever you would use mic-cable for, and…

…you can also, without spinning up a cloud of doubt in your mind, use it in a DMX lighting-control network.

This is not to say that basic mic cable can never be used for DMX runs. I’ve done it, and without noticeable problems. Even so, it’s not a practice that I would recommend to anyone without caveats. I try to be careful to say the previous: That I’ve done it, and it worked, but your mileage may vary, so the safe option is what I recommend unless you’re truly in a jam.

But anyway, the more I convert to an all-DMX cable inventory, the less sorting out of cable types I have to do. If it’s all (or overwhelmingly) DMX, then no matter what I’m doing I can just grab a cable and go.

Of course, a question does arise: How does something like a dynamic mic react to a DMX cable in place of a regular cable? Lucky for you all, I like to graph things:

The graph is two traces on top of each other. One is the mic cable, and one is the DMX cable. They’re so close that I can’t imagine any of the deviations are something other than experimental error; You can only be so careful about not moving the mic when you replace a cable. I’m confident that any difference between the cables one thinks one might hear is a product of the imagination.

Biggest Isn’t Always The Most Survivable

Small and scrappy sometimes lives through disasters.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

 
Want to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

When I compare January – September 2019 with January – September 2020, there’s a stark reality that emerges: My audio-human revenue is down 64%.

Yeowch.

But I’m still getting some shows and some work on that front, while big pieces of our industry are at a dead stop. It’s a bit surprising to me, but not without plausible explanation.

It has to do with my understanding of how the dinosaurs died out.

When the asteroid hit and the environment changed, being a huge creature with huge energy needs was no longer an asset. It was a liability. You might have been monstrously vigorous. You might have had oceanic reserves of nutrition.

But your size meant you burned through those reserves at a terrifying pace, and when the resources you relied on suddenly disappeared you were stuck. Stuck with being enormous and resource-hungry. Stuck with seeming so strong, yet being deceivingly fragile: Your environment was the source of your strength, not yourself, and when that environment ceased to serve, you quickly found your end.

I feel badly for the folks running a kind of shop that absolutely, positively requires large-attendance gigs in order to pay the bills. That sort of outfit has big resources, but also tends to have big outlays – outlays that often can’t be shut off easily. Big venues can’t simply offload a building and then get it back when it’s convenient, for example.

But, for those of us who are smaller and scrappier, who can find a market connected with house-shows and DIY, our troubles aren’t as existential. It’s not that there isn’t a famine in the land, it’s just that we can hold on with what’s available for a longer stretch of time. It’s not a guarantee that we’ll make it, but we may have better chances in a proportional sense.

I’m a lot less gloomy than I used to be. In some ways, I’m excited. An event that causes so much disruption to an industry can be a surprising source of opportunity for the folks who can look down the reshaped waterways of the business and go, “That looks interesting down there.”

I have real hopes of being one of the little creatures that emerges as the Earth warms again, blinking at the light of the sun.

Change Your Solo Setup And Become More Comfortable Mixing IEMs

Exclusive solo follows selection = much happiness.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

 
Want to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

When it comes to mixing in-ears, I’m very average. Workmanlike. I get the job done, but I’m not inspiring at the task. I’ve gotten better lately though, due to a breakthrough I had while running ears for a one-off with a Beatles tribute.

It was one of those moments where necessity was the doting mama of invention. Well, not really invention. Discovery. Thinking about a problem and then working through it.

The group we were working with didn’t have personal remotes for their mixes, and soundcheck hadn’t been particularly detailed for monitor-world. I really wanted to have my finger on the pulse of what the band was listening to, in hopes that I could make changes very quickly and intelligently when asked. With a regular solo setup – the solo setup being how the engineer manages what they listen to in their own ears – I felt like getting around to different mixes was clumsy.

I started asking myself, “What do I want my console to do?” What I came up with was:

  1. I wanted the console to only solo one thing at a time.
  2. I wanted the console to solo what I had selected.

Why?

In my case, it boils down to sends-on-fader behavior. On an X32, you can select a channel, and see the various bus-send levels laid out in the group/ bus section. What you can also do is select a bus, and see the channel-send levels in the channel section. My “IEMs on the fly in a panic” workflow is, overwhelmingly, the latter. I want to “work on” a bus, not channels. That being the case, what I desire to listen to is the bus I’m addressing, and only that bus. Then, if the console will automatically move my active solo to the bus I just pressed “select” on, that saves me some work.

Thankfully, solo configurations as I’ve just described are available on X32s and other consoles. (The nomenclature can vary a good bit, so you’ll need to look up specifics for yourself.) I enabled the settings I wanted, and “boom!” everything was better. Operating the console felt much more fluid, and I was confident that I was listening to the right thing at the right time. I didn’t have to constantly manage my solos, because the console was doing that for me.

Of course, easily listening to the bus you’re working on has limitations. The biggest one is that you don’t know exactly what the performer is hearing. The in-ears or phones you’re using may have wildly different sealing/ isolation characteristics from what the player uses. Plus, you don’t necessarily know how much SPL is pouring out of their drivers vs. yours. You can’t assume that what your ears are getting is exactly what they’ve got. Still, having some sort of immediate reference is very helpful, as it takes some of the mystery out of what’s happening in their mix.

Acoustic Calculator Update

It has been markedly improved.

Please Remember:

The opinions expressed are mine only. These opinions do not necessarily reflect anybody else’s opinions. I do not own, operate, manage, or represent any band, venue, or company that I talk about, unless explicitly noted.

 
Want to use this image for something else? Great! Click it for the link to a high-res or resolution-independent version.

Along with some under-the-hood improvements to display and general behavior, you can now hide the controls if you like…and add delays to drivers!

The calculator is available here.